[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: time values
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: time values |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:26:14 -0500 (CDT) |
>From my previous message:
By the way, your current code seems to assume that
`visited-file-modtime' is not 0. Are you sure of that?
Yes. I should have read the code of `verify-visited-file-modtime'
more carefully. If `visited-file-modtime' returns 0, then
`verify-visited-file-modtime' does not even call the handler.
Actually, it might be sufficient, because
`tramp-handle-verify-visited-file-modtime' probably never will get
called if the buffer is not visiting a file. Are we sure of this?
Yes, for the same reason. So there was no reason to worry about that
either.
Well, at least there is no reason to worry about those two things
_unless_ `tramp-handle-verify-visited-file-modtime' could be called
from some place else than `verify-visited-file-modtime', which would
however surprise me.
There are still problems with the last `t' clause. I will submit a
revised patch tomorrow.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- time values, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/07/10
- Re: time values, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/07/11
- Re: time values, Andreas Schwab, 2004/07/11
- Re: time values, Alex Schroeder, 2004/07/11
- Re: time values, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/07/11
- Re: time values, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/07/11
- Re: time values,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: time values, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/07/11
- Re: time values, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/07/11
- Re: time values, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/11
- Re: time values, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/07/12
- Re: time values, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/11