[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 62
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 62 |
Date: |
12 Jul 2004 16:23:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>
> > So what about testing the patch I sent you.
>
> It's obviously correct, isn't it? :-)
>
I assume it is, but OTOH, I don't know how many times I've seen (and
written) obviously correct code that didn't work :-)
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 62, Andreas Schwab, 2004/07/06
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 62, Kim F. Storm, 2004/07/12
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 62, Andreas Schwab, 2004/07/12
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 62, Kim F. Storm, 2004/07/12
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 62, Andreas Schwab, 2004/07/12
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 62, Kim F. Storm, 2004/07/12
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 62, Andreas Schwab, 2004/07/12
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 62, Kim F. Storm, 2004/07/12
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 62, Andreas Schwab, 2004/07/12
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 62,
Kim F. Storm <=