[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rmail mbox-format branch
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Rmail mbox-format branch |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Sep 2004 14:17:17 +0300 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 06:52:00 -0400
>
> Rmail is the primary Emacs mail-reader. I don't know how many people
> currently use it, but I will ignore any suggestion to treat it as
> unimportant.
If something that I said somehow implied that RMAIL is to be
considered unimportant, then please disregard that something. I
couldn't have possibly meant anything like that, since I'm one of the
few people who use RMAIL (and _only_ RMAIL) to read my mail.
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, (continued)
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/09/10
- Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/11
- Re: Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Luc Teirlinck, 2004/09/14
- Re: Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Richard Stallman, 2004/09/16
- Re: Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Luc Teirlinck, 2004/09/18
- Re: Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Richard Stallman, 2004/09/19
- Re: Proof-reading manuals, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/19
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/11