[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.]
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.] |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:39:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> True, that's another way to continue the sequence after .90, ..., .99
> and IIRC both have been used in the past. I like the .999 scheme better,
> tho ;-)
Since version numbers are not fractions, but rather sequences of numbers,
continuing with .100 is more natural.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], (continued)
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Rob Browning, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Jérôme Marant, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.],
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Richard Stallman, 2004/09/30
Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.], Kenichi Handa, 2004/09/27