[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils
From: |
Stefan |
Subject: |
Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Oct 2004 13:12:08 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) |
> My primary concern, however, is that mm- stuff is rather a MIME
> parser (viewer), while rfc*.el files implement basic functions.
> Wouldn't it be good to have these two things clearly separated?
I guess I'd agree with the following:
- changes that remove dependencies from rfc* to mm*
- changes that remove dependencies from mm* to gnus*
- moving rfc* and mm* files from gnus/ to mail/
I don't see a strong need to create a mime-only subdirectory (of course
mail/mime is even worse since we currently only support one level of
subdirectory).
Stefan
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: expunge, Alexander Pohoyda, 2004/10/03
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: expunge, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/04
- [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Alexander Pohoyda, 2004/10/06
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Miles Bader, 2004/10/06
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Alexander Pohoyda, 2004/10/08
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Miles Bader, 2004/10/08
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Alexander Pohoyda, 2004/10/09
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils,
Stefan <=
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Alexander Pohoyda, 2004/10/09
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Miles Bader, 2004/10/09
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Alexander Pohoyda, 2004/10/09
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Miles Bader, 2004/10/09
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Miles Bader, 2004/10/09
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/10
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Miles Bader, 2004/10/10
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/11
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Miles Bader, 2004/10/11
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Juri Linkov, 2004/10/12