[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(no subject)
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
(no subject) |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Oct 2004 17:10:25 -0700 |
Commands like `customize-group-other-window', and function
`custom-buffer-create-other-window' were apparently designed _not_ to select
the custom buffer after displaying it.
This can be inconvenient if you use separate frames, instead of windows
(pop-up-frames t).
For example, suppose I want to do something to or in the custom buffer after
it is displayed. To be more specific, suppose I want to resize (fit) the
frame to the buffer if the custom buffer is alone in its frame (which it
will be, because of pop-up-frames).
What are my options?
1. Is there a hook that's run after display of the custom buffer? I don't
think so; I find only custom-mode-hook, which is run before the buffer is
displayed. Doing the frame fitting at that time is no good.
2. How about using a defadvice-after? Well, that would be logical, except
that the custom buffer is not selected. I could select it in the defadvice,
but then I would need to copy & use the code that creates the buffer name.
Which more or less amounts to option #3.
3. _Redefine_ the functions.
So, in order to avoid having people redefine such functions just to do
something simple after the buffer is displayed, how about making one of
these changes?
- Select the custom buffer in the other window/frame. OK by me -- I don't
understand why this isn't done now; after all, the custom buffer is mainly
for editing. But, I can anticipate others groaning, and I'm sure there must
be good reasons (with pop-up-frames nil) for the current behavior. After
all, all of these functions go out of their way to unselect the custom
buffer.
- Select the custom buffer, but only if pop-up-frames is t. OK by me, but
it seems like kind of a hack.
- Provide an after-display hook for the customize functions; it would be
run with the custom buffer selected (before unselecting it as is currently
done).
Any reason we shouldn't implement one of these (or another)?
- Drew
- (no subject), Duane Dahl, 2004/10/01
- (no subject), Rogelio Lott, 2004/10/04
- (no subject), May Dixon, 2004/10/08
- (no subject), Geoffrey Spears, 2004/10/08
- (no subject),
Drew Adams <=
- (no subject), Eddy, 2004/10/11
- (no subject), Mcdermott, 2004/10/20
- (no subject), Guerra, 2004/10/21
- (no subject), Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/22
- (no subject), Tommie Bullock, 2004/10/24
- (no subject), Becky Sorensen, 2004/10/26