[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `inhibit-mark-movement'
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: `inhibit-mark-movement' |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:59:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> What I'm trying to suggest is that commands should not modify active mark
> in Transient Mark mode _by side effect_. Commands like M-h are fine to
> modify mark, because they _activate_ it. If command is not meant to
> activate mark and the mark is active, the command should not touch it at
> all, because I activated mark exactly where I wanted it to be. If the
> mark is inactive, commands can alter it, because this is not intrusive
> for Transient Mark mode users and is useful for popping to previous mark
> positions.
That sounds right. And IIUC this change would only affect users of
transient-mark-mde, i.e. users who are likely to actually immediately *see*
when the behavior is different from what they expect.
Stefan
- `inhibit-mark-movement', Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/12/07
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Stefan Monnier, 2004/12/07
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/12/08
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement',
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Juri Linkov, 2004/12/08
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Stefan Monnier, 2004/12/08
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Juri Linkov, 2004/12/08
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Richard Stallman, 2004/12/13
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Stefan Monnier, 2004/12/13
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Juri Linkov, 2004/12/14
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Stefan Monnier, 2004/12/14
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Juri Linkov, 2004/12/17
- Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Richard Stallman, 2004/12/20
Re: `inhibit-mark-movement', Juri Linkov, 2004/12/07