Re: `etags' bug?

[Paul Pogonyshev]

Francesco Potorti` wrote:
> >So far for the theory.
>
> Ok, I added a couple comments to make this clearer.
>
> >                      Unfortunately a typo during the conversion of
> >LONG_OPTIONS from a preprocessing to a compile time constant has broken
> >this.  I've installed this patch to fix this:
>
> Wow!  Thank you.  My regression test suite did not cover this case...
>
> Paul, could you please apply Andreas' patch and, if the bug is still
> there, get in touch with me?

Andreas' patch fixes the problem, it now works as expected and as it did
before.  Thank you.

Paul