[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: file-name-shadow-mode
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: file-name-shadow-mode |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:01:27 -0500 |
The functionality of rfn-eshadow is quite useful to the vast majority
of users, and indeed is much-requested, and you want to not enable it
because you found a minor flaw? A flaw whose only effect is to make
the prompt slightly less clear that it could be?
I agree: this bug is not enough reason not to enable the feature.
However, it would be nice to fix the bug.
[I think it's probably possible to fix this -- e.g., by generating a
regexp of all non-absolute environment variables and glomming it onto
the rexexp used for filenames. But my basic point is that it scarcely
matters.]
Could you try fixing it that way?
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, (continued)
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/19
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Miles Bader, 2005/03/19
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, David Kastrup, 2005/03/19
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/20
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, David Kastrup, 2005/03/20
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/20
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/20
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, David Kastrup, 2005/03/20
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/20
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/20
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/21
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/21
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/21
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/22
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/28
- Re: file-name-shadow-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/21