[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Incompatible change without "warning"
From: |
Lute Kamstra |
Subject: |
Re: Incompatible change without "warning" |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:25:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
>> defvaralias is part of Emacs since version 21.1.
>
> Uh what?
>
>> It does have an entry in NEWS under "Lisp Changes in Emacs 22.1", tho.
>> I wonder why it was put there. Maybe because it wasn't mentioned in
>> NEWS for 21.1? We better mention explicitly that it isn't really new
>> for 22.1, in that case.
>
> What makes you think it isn't? My Emacs-21.3 does not have it.
I used the Emacs from Debian:
(emacs-version) =>
"GNU Emacs 21.4.1 (i386-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars)
of 2005-03-17 on trouble, modified by Debian"
(fboundp 'defvaralias) => t
and also:
,----[ src/ChangeLog.9 ]
| 2001-10-20 Gerd Moellmann <address@hidden>
|
| * (Version 21.1 released.)
|
| [...]
|
| 2001-10-04 Gerd Moellmann <address@hidden>
|
| [...]
|
| (Fdefvaralias): New function.
`----
But I overlooked an earlier:
,----[ src/ChangeLog.9 ]
| 2001-10-04 Gerd Moellmann <address@hidden>
|
| * Branch for 21.1.
`----
and I found out that the Big Brother Database does:
,----[ bbdb.el ]
| (unless (fboundp 'defvaralias)
| (defun defvaralias (&rest args)))
`----
I guess it ain't called insidious for nothin'.
Sorry for the noise,
Lute.
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", (continued)
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/19
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Kevin Rodgers, 2005/04/19
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/04/20
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/20
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/21
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/21
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/22
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/22
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/23
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", David Kastrup, 2005/04/23
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning",
Lute Kamstra <=
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/23
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Eli Zaretskii, 2005/04/23
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/23
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/04/21
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/21
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/21
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/04/23
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/26
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/26
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/26