[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: define-derived-mode
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: define-derived-mode |
Date: |
Mon, 09 May 2005 04:57:47 -0400 |
> However, I am not sure we want defcustoms for *any* mode hooks. How
> often would a user want to customize one with defcustom?
C:\...\lisp> grep -E "defcustom.*-mode-hook" *.el
add-log.el:(defcustom change-log-mode-hook nil
autorevert.el:(defcustom auto-revert-mode-hook nil
So what? The question is whether these are useful,
not whether they exist.
We have just been reminded of the reasons why customizing
these hooks is likely not to work right--in addition to the
fact that the motive to do so is probably rare.
We wrote those defcustoms because a feeling developed
that it was the right thing to use defcustom for every
variable that someone might perhaps want to customize.
But that doesn't mean we have to stick with them.
- Re: define-derived-mode, (continued)
- Re: define-derived-mode, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/08
- Re: define-derived-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/08
- Re: define-derived-mode, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/09
- Re: define-derived-mode, David Kastrup, 2005/05/09
- Re: define-derived-mode, Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/12
- Re: define-derived-mode, Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/17
- Re: define-derived-mode, Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/09
- Re: define-derived-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/09
- Re: define-derived-mode, Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/10
- Re: define-derived-mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/05/08
- Re: define-derived-mode,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: define-derived-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/08