[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flyspell bug
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: flyspell bug |
Date: |
Sat, 14 May 2005 00:07:42 -0400 |
The current version I have does not try to enforce a particular speller
- both ispell and aspell are supported. The choice is determined by the
setting of the customized variable `ispell-prefer-aspell' when both ispell
and aspell exist on the system.
That sounds good.
I have several other patches, improvements to integrate into the current
version of ispell as well.
How about sending us this version in some form or other?
- Re: flyspell bug, (continued)
- Re: flyspell bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/05/10
- Re: flyspell bug, Juri Linkov, 2005/05/11
- Re: flyspell bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/05/11
- Re: flyspell bug, Juri Linkov, 2005/05/12
- Re: flyspell bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/05/12
- Re: flyspell bug, Juri Linkov, 2005/05/12
- Re: flyspell bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/05/12
- Re: flyspell bug, Ken Stevens, 2005/05/12
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/13
- Re: flyspell bug, Ken Stevens, 2005/05/13
- Re: flyspell bug,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/12
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/12
- Re: flyspell bug, Kevin Atkinson, 2005/05/23
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Kevin Atkinson, 2005/05/25
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/26
- Re: flyspell bug, Juri Linkov, 2005/05/25
- Re: flyspell bug, Kevin Atkinson, 2005/05/25
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/26
Re: flyspell bug, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/11