|
From: | Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: | Re: CL function's docstrings |
Date: | Wed, 18 May 2005 10:09:54 +0200 |
> How about if you do whatever is best so as to use the best possible names > in each function? OK. That's even better. assuming there's no interest in maintaining absolute argument-name consistency between functions (which doesn't exist now, to be fair). -- /L/e/k/t/u
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |