[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-next-action not behaving
From: |
Andre Spiegel |
Subject: |
Re: vc-next-action not behaving |
Date: |
Thu, 26 May 2005 10:08:17 +0200 |
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 21:10 -0400, David Abrahams wrote:
> In recent CVS builds of emacs (on NT), when I do `C-x v v' on an
> *unmodified* file under version control, and I get:
>
> File is edited but read-only; making it writable
> File is under version-control; use C-x v v to check in/out
When you visit the file initially, what version state does it show on
the mode line? Does it show something like "CVS-1.1", or "CVS:1.1".
The latter would mean that Emacs already considers the file edited when
you first visit it.
Emacs considers the file edited if the time stamp in CVS/Entries and the
mtime of the working file do not agree. You could check these time
stamps for an unmodified file, you could also try and step through
vc-cvs-parse-entry, to see if the time stamps are properly analyzed.
Maybe it's a timezone issue?
- vc-next-action not behaving, David Abrahams, 2005/05/25
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving,
Andre Spiegel <=
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, David Abrahams, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, Andre Spiegel, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, David Abrahams, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, Andreas Schwab, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, David Abrahams, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, Andreas Schwab, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, David Abrahams, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, David Abrahams, 2005/05/26