[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks.
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks. |
Date: |
Fri, 27 May 2005 10:01:30 +0200 |
> Maybe Gnus can do something like:
>
> (or (fboundp 'run-mode-hooks)
> (defalias 'run-mode-hooks 'run-hooks))
(Not in this case, that's already been fixed but) that would not be good.
The usual answer is making your own lookalike:
(if (fboundp 'function-in-doubt)
(defalias 'mymodule-function-in-doubt 'function-in-doubt)
(defun mymodule-function-in-doubt ...))
Otherwise, you're gonna mislead any module loaded afterwards that
tries to determine whether 'function-in-doubt exists or not.
--
/L/e/k/t/u
- run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/25
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks.,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/27
- RE: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Drew Adams, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Juanma Barranquero, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Miles Bader, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/30
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/31
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/28