[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: File modes facilities.
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: File modes facilities. |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:51:42 -0400 |
Agreed. I actually firmly believe that we should be able to provide
elisp code for the interactive spec of a C function.
This would also allow us to get rid of the load vs load-file distinction
and to improve various other commands implemented in C where the minibuffer
query only provides a fairly dull default.
It is a good idea for sometime later.
It would be possible to make one of load-file and load-library
be the same as `load', but we would still need two commands
for loading, since the motive for them is to have two different
ways of reading the argument.
- Re: File modes facilities., (continued)
- Re: File modes facilities., Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/25
- Re: File modes facilities., Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/25
- Re: File modes facilities., Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/26
- Re: File modes facilities., Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/26
- Re: File modes facilities., Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/26
- Re: File modes facilities., Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/21
- Re: File modes facilities., Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/21
- Re: File modes facilities., Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/21
- Re: File modes facilities.,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: File modes facilities., Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/21
- Re: File modes facilities., Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/22
- RE: File modes facilities., Drew Adams, 2005/10/22
- Re: File modes facilities., Miles Bader, 2005/10/22
- RE: File modes facilities., Drew Adams, 2005/10/22
- Re: File modes facilities., Miles Bader, 2005/10/22
- RE: File modes facilities., Drew Adams, 2005/10/22
- Re: File modes facilities., Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/23
- RE: File modes facilities., Drew Adams, 2005/10/23
- Re: File modes facilities., Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/24