[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: New function for gdb-ui.el? |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:49:07 +0200 |
> From: Nick Roberts <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:00:51 +1300
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > Actually, now I am not sure what I said is true. Maybe `until' just
> > sets a temporary breakpoint and continues. If so, it would actually
> > "work" even if you specify a line in a different function.
>
> The manual says:
>
> GDB> Continue running your program until either the specified location
> GDB> is reached, or the current stack frame returns.
>
> (actually, it should say *selected* stack frame returns)
I don't think ``selected'' is more accurate or more clear in this
context than ``current''.
The latest version of the manual has this clarification:
The specified location is actually reached only if it is in the
current frame.
> > > But there is an exception: when a function in one file is inlined in
> > > another. In that case, shouldn't this command work?
> >
> > If I try it, it doesn't seem to work. Even if it, I'm not sure how we
> > would make use of it.
> >
> > If it doesn't work, maybe that is a flaw in GDB. It OUGHT to be
> > possible to proceed to a specific line in the code another function
> > that was inlined into this function.
> >
> > Would you like to raise that is with bug-gdb and cc me?
>
> The problem is that the documentation just talks about being able to skip over
> recursive functions and doesn't mention inline functions. So I'm not sure
> that they would see it as a bug.
I'd suggest to craft a simple test case with inlined function and ask
the question on the GDB mailing list. I'd expect `until' to stop in
an inlined function; the fact that the manual doesn't say anything
about this might just be a documentation bug.
- Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?, (continued)
Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?, Frank Schmitt, 2005/10/24
- Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?, Nick Roberts, 2005/10/24
- Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?, Frank Schmitt, 2005/10/24
- Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/24
- Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?, Nick Roberts, 2005/10/24
- Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/25
- Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?, Nick Roberts, 2005/10/25
- Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?, Nick Roberts, 2005/10/26
- gcc and inline [was: Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?], Tomas Zerolo, 2005/10/26
- Re: gcc and inline [was: Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?], Eli Zaretskii, 2005/10/26
- Re: gcc and inline [was: Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?], Andreas Schwab, 2005/10/26
- Re: gcc and inline [was: Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?], Tomas Zerolo, 2005/10/27
- Re: gcc and inline [was: Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?], Eli Zaretskii, 2005/10/27
- Re: gcc and inline [was: Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?], Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/27
- Re: gcc and inline [was: Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?], Eli Zaretskii, 2005/10/28
- Re: gcc and inline [was: Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?], Tomas Zerolo, 2005/10/28
- Re: gcc and inline [was: Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?], Miles Bader, 2005/10/28