[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flyspell bug
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: flyspell bug |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:11:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Piet van Oostrum <address@hidden> writes:
> I installed the french dictionary and found the bug.
>
> The problem is that ispell considers "local.h" an incorrect word,
> but flyspell-word (and ispell-word) when checking consider "h" the
> word in question and consider it good. The reason is that ispell.el
> and ispell the program don't agree on what's a word. In francais.aff
> the boundarychars are [-'address@hidden and in the ispell-dictionary-alist
> only
> [-']. Therefore ispell the program considers "local.h" one word and
> ispell.el considers it two words. I don't know why "." and "@" are
> included in the affix file (especially "@" seems strange) but I
> guess a French person might explain it. Anyway it helps to add "."
> and "@" to otherchars in the ispell-dictionary-alist entry for
> francais. By the way, I don't think aspell considers "@" to be a
> boundarychar.
That does not sound like a robust solution, and it will change along
with languages. There is no good way to make mostly irrelevant
whether Emacs and flyspell don't quite agree on word boundaries?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: flyspell bug, (continued)
- Re: flyspell bug, Agustin Martin, 2005/10/28
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/28
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/28
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/29
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/31
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/29
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/29
- Re: flyspell bug,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/29
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/29
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/30
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/30
- Re: flyspell bug, Agustin Martin, 2005/10/29
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/30
- Re: flyspell bug, Agustin Martin, 2005/10/28