[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Dec 2005 10:44:20 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> I'm still trying to track this down, but just for the record: If I
>>> build recent sources with CC='gcc -DENABLE_CHECKING -
>>> DUSE_LISP_UNION_TYPE', bootstrapping fails:
>>
>> Fixed... With these options enabled, EQ evaluates its arguments
>> twice.
> I think that should be fixed. The requirement that arguments of EQ or
> NILP need to be side effect free is too easy to forget, since it is
> nowhere documented.
The argument of *any* macro should be free of side effects.
Stefan
- bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Ken Raeburn, 2005/12/05
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Ken Raeburn, 2005/12/06
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Andreas Schwab, 2005/12/06
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Andreas Schwab, 2005/12/06
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Stefan Monnier, 2005/12/06
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Andreas Schwab, 2005/12/06
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Ken Raeburn, 2005/12/07
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/07
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Ken Raeburn, 2005/12/08
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/08
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Stefan Monnier, 2005/12/08
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Henrik Enberg, 2005/12/09
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/09