[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fixing rectangle operations
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Fixing rectangle operations |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:51:37 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> The point is before 'long' in the first line. Vim documents
>>> that if one want to insert 'very ' before these two 'long's,
>>> it will ignore the short line. Hence the result is:
>>>
>>> This is a very long line
>>> short
>>> Any other very long line
>>
>> I dunno, vim's behavior seems kind of bizarre to me.
>>
>> Treating all lines as implicitly "blank extended" in rectangle
>> operations seems much more natural (and _not_ doing so likely to cause a
>> lot of user confusion).
> I agree. I can see the problem with Emacs doing what it does, but
> that feels more natural. At least in the situations I use C-x r t I
> have never seen this as a problem.
Clearly both behaviors make sense.
If that really matters, we could provide the Vim behavior via C-u prefix or
via another command.
Stefan
- Fixing rectangle operations, Herbert Euler, 2005/12/14
- RE: Fixing rectangle operations, Herbert Euler, 2005/12/15
- Re: Fixing rectangle operations, Miles Bader, 2005/12/15
- Re: Fixing rectangle operations, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/15
- Re: Fixing rectangle operations,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Fixing rectangle operations, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/15
- Re: Fixing rectangle operations, Johan Bockgård, 2005/12/15
- Re: Fixing rectangle operations, Herbert Euler, 2005/12/15
- Re: Fixing rectangle operations, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/16
- Re: Fixing rectangle operations, Herbert Euler, 2005/12/16
- Re: Fixing rectangle operations, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/19
Re: Fixing rectangle operations, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/12/19