[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More problems with flyspell
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: More problems with flyspell |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:47:58 -0500 |
While we are with this, I have noticed that
flyspell-accept-buffer-local-defs is called from flyspell-large-region, but
not from flyspell-small-region.
flyspell-small-region works by calling flyspell-word. I thought that
flyspell-word arranged to do flyspell-accept-buffer-local-defs, or
the equivalent. Doesn't it do that?
However, if calling flyspell-accept-buffer-local-defs twice does no
harm, it would be fine to move that call into flyspell-region.
- More problems with flyspell, Piet van Oostrum, 2006/01/05
- Re: More problems with flyspell, Stefan Monnier, 2006/01/05
- Re: More problems with flyspell, Agustin Martin, 2006/01/05
- Re: More problems with flyspell,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: More problems with flyspell, Agustin Martin, 2006/01/09
- Re: More problems with flyspell, Agustin Martin, 2006/01/09
- Re: More problems with flyspell, Stefan Monnier, 2006/01/09
- Re: More problems with flyspell, Agustin Martin, 2006/01/09
- Re: More problems with flyspell, Stefan Monnier, 2006/01/09
- Re: More problems with flyspell, Agustin Martin, 2006/01/10