[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
windows-XXXX and cpXXXX
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
windows-XXXX and cpXXXX |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:38:01 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
I changed the Subject: line.
In article <address@hidden>, Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:
>> >>(setq auto-coding-regexp-alist
>> >> (cons '("[\040-\177][\200-\237]" . cp1252)
>> >> auto-coding-regexp-alist))
Please note that even in the latest code, Emacs doesn't know
about cp1252. It knows only windows-1252.
Emacs currently knows these windows-* coding sysmtems:
windows-1250 windows-1251 windows-1252 windows-1253
windows-1254 windows-1255 windows-1256 windows-1257 windows-1258
and these cp* coding systems:
cp437 cp720 cp737 cp775 cp850 cp851 cp852 cp855 cp857 cp860
cp861 cp862 cp863 cp864 cp865 cp866 cp869 cp874 cp1125
But it seems that windows-XXXX are quite frequently called
as cpXXXX(*). If so, I'll register cpXXXXs as alises of the
corresponding windows-XXXXs, ok?
Note (*): IANA doesn't lists cpXXXX. It lists only cpXXXs
as an alias of IBMXXXs. And, I've never seen an complaint
saying that Emacs doesn't know about IBMXXX.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- windows-XXXX and cpXXXX,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/10
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/11
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/11
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/11
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/11
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/01/12
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/12
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/12
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/12
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/12