[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 06:31:53 +0200 |
> From: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:05:43 +0900
>
> In article <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> So, I think the name cpXXXXs have already acquired
> >> citizenship, and thus it is a lack of sophistication not to
> >> support the name cpXXXX.
>
> > That's too bad.
>
> Yes, that's too bad. So, what should we do?
If you think it's imperative that we let users have cp* encodings, go
ahead and install the changes.
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, (continued)
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/12
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/12
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/12
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/13
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/13
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/13
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/15
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/16
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Stefan Monnier, 2006/01/13