[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A silly little request...
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: A silly little request... |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 02:26:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Nick Roberts <address@hidden> writes:
> > > So it can be enabled e.g in your .emacs, before starting a debug
> > > session.
> >
> > But for that purpose it need not be marked as an autoloaded command.
> > An autoloaded function would be enough (and it would make more sense
> > to be able to customize it without needing to load it at .emacs time).
>
> It needs to be marked as an autoloaded command because it *is* a
> command, and not just a function.
I don't see how this "because" applies.
> > I don't think there is a point in being able to call
> > gud-toolkit-mode as a _command_ when no gud-session has been
> > started yet.
>
> Its gud-tooltip-mode actually, Mrs Malaprop.
I might be singing alto, but still that remark seems more Malaprop
than mine.
> Someone who uses it might find it convenient not to have to enable
> it explicitly each time.
Having it as an autoloaded function would be completely sufficient for
that.
> It could be added to gdb-mode-hook by the user but thats more
> obscure.
And quite better, since it would not necessitate loading gud.el unless
it actually got used.
> > > David could always set gu as an alias for gnus (or type a bit more
> > > slowly!).
> >
> > Sure, so can everybody else, and that holds for everything
> > tripping people up while being "technically correct".
>
> Perhaps you'd also like something to be done about
> number-to-register for when you accidentally type M-x nu,
> etc.
This does not seem to happen to me, and besides, the command has no
really unfathomable consequences: just type C-g and it aborts.
> Anyway, it doesn't matter what I think, we might as well wait for a
> decree.
I am not sure this warrants a decree.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
Re: A silly little request..., Kim F. Storm, 2006/01/23
Re: A silly little request..., Piet van Oostrum, 2006/01/23