[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Display slowness that is painful
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: Display slowness that is painful |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:50:11 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Richard M. Stallman" <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm confused. How does it make sense to display characters in \XXX
> format instead? Both methods produce gibberish (as one would expect
> of a binary file). So we might as well choose the gibberish that
> redisplays faster.
>
> Making it 4 times as fast is not enough. It will still be
> intolerable. This ought to be hundreds of times as fast, and I am
> sure it can be, with a fairly small change--once someone sees what
> is taking the time.
Actually, displaying unibyte text according to the language
environment is faster than displaying it in octal format -- in the
case of the bmp file you provided, the delay is negligible.
Re: Display slowness that is painful, Andreas Schwab, 2006/02/01
Re: Display slowness that is painful, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/01
- Re: Display slowness that is painful,
Chong Yidong <=
Re: Display slowness that is painful, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/01
Re: Display slowness that is painful, Kim F. Storm, 2006/02/02
Re: Display slowness that is painful, Kenichi Handa, 2006/02/02
Re: Display slowness that is painful, Kim F. Storm, 2006/02/03
Re: Display slowness that is painful, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/04