[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Risky local variable mechanism
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Risky local variable mechanism |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:50:43 -0600 (CST) |
Chong Yidong wrote:
I've installed the patch changing the way file local variables are
handled. Please see if there are any problems.
I have not yet taken any real look at it, but I believe that @var{(var . val)}
is bad Texinfo. It believe that it should be @code{(@var{var} . @var{val}}:
===File ~/variables.texi-diff-2=============================
*** variables.texi 13 Feb 2006 19:55:31 -0600 1.72
--- variables.texi 13 Feb 2006 20:00:18 -0600
***************
*** 1794,1801 ****
@defopt safe-local-variable-values
This variable provides another way to mark variables as safe. It is a
! list of cons cells @var{(var . val)}, where @var{var} is a variable
! name and @var{val} is a value of that variable that is safe.
When Emacs asks the user whether or not to obey a set of file variable
specifications, the user can choose to mark them as safe. This adds
--- 1794,1801 ----
@defopt safe-local-variable-values
This variable provides another way to mark variables as safe. It is a
! list of cons cells @code{(@var{var} . @var{val})}, where @var{var} is
! a variable name and @var{val} is a value of that variable that is safe.
When Emacs asks the user whether or not to obey a set of file variable
specifications, the user can choose to mark them as safe. This adds
============================================================
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, (continued)
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/10
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/11
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/11
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/10
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/11
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/11
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/11
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/14
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/13
- safe-local-variable additions (was: Risky local variable mechanism), Reiner Steib, 2006/02/16
- Re: safe-local-variable additions, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/16
- Re: safe-local-variable additions, Reiner Steib, 2006/02/17