Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values

[Kim F. Storm]

Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:

> Note that allowing saves for risky local variables is practically
> equivalent to eliminating the concept of risky local variables.  

Why?  If we approve it for a specific combination of variables/values
in a specific file only, how can it be equivalent?

>                                                                  If
> Emacs allows saves for any variable not considered safe, the
> `risky-local-variable' property has no special effect (as far as the
> loading of local variables is concerned).

Did you read my proposal to do an MD5 checksum over the local
variables + filename if any of the variables are risky?

I think it is a _safe_ way to save a specific combination of risky
variables.

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk