Re: address@hidden: Re: emacsclient additional arguments buried]

[Richard Stallman]

    What exactly needs to be done here?  If we don't want the additional
    files to be buried, that is easy enough to do (one-liner patch below).
    But I'm not sure that is the correct thing to do---it could be
    construed as interfering with the server's buffer setup.

I think he wants them to go at the front of the buffer list,
as if each one had been visited when the server asked for it.

At the same time, I can see how this might be undesirable for some
users.