[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strange eval-after-load
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Strange eval-after-load |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Jul 2006 13:01:48 -0400 |
1. It seems to me this can be done without any setup work on the
part of the package. Suppose the provide routine were changed to run a
specified hook, e.g. "foo-provide-hook" if "(provide 'foo)" were
executed, and the symbol "foo" was not already on the "features" list?
What you are trying to achieve is precisely the problem I am trying to
avoid. Namely, that this would work with no explicit call in the file.
The explicit call in the file is what calls the programmer's attention
to the fact that some code might be run from there.
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, (continued)
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Michael Albinus, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, John Paul Wallington, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Johan Bockgård, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Bob Rogers, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Stuart D. Herring, 2006/07/05
- Re: Strange eval-after-load,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Hi, I'm back! + Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/02
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, David Kastrup, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, David Kastrup, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, David Kastrup, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Nick Roberts, 2006/07/04