Re: Revamping sit-for

[Kim F. Storm]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>       *** `sit-for' called with a negative SECONDS value now forces an
>       immediate redisplay even if input is pending.
>
>     is now unnecessary; (sit-for -1) will do exactly the same thing as
>     (redisplay t) and the latter is much clearer
>
>     If there are no objections, I'll remove the negative-sit-for behavior,
>     and add a note about `redisplay' to NEWS.
>
> Please do.
>
> Would you please also update the Lisp Manual?  Please search for
> sit-for in the manual to make sure you find all the places that need
> to be changed.

I already made those changes yesterday, including updating the manual.

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk