Re: Building Emacs overflowed pure space

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:01:41 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
>         address@hidden
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
>    No, this cannot explain the differences I was trying to investigate,
>    because I made a point, as part of my testing, of building Emacs both
>    with and without bootstrap.  I got the same numbers in both cases.
> 
> On the other hand, I guess that you read the following two messages in
> which two people reported seeing a difference in pure-bytes-used
> depending on the way they compiled Emacs?

Yes, I've read it.  But note that even those messages talk about a
small discrepancy (1300 to 2200 bytes), whereas the differences I was
looking into were much larger.