[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: safe_call1 considered harmful
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: safe_call1 considered harmful |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:44:10 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> But, by considering this problem again, I found another
> solution than calling find-operation-coding-system with
> (FILENAME . BUFFER). That is to provide an extra argument
> BUFFER.
> Would you please be more concrete? Passing an extra argument to a set
> of functions is very incompatible.
find-operation-coding-system calls a registered function
with a single argument; a list of arguments given to
find-operation-coding-system. So, appending an extra
argument at the tail of the list is fairly safe.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- safe_call1 considered harmful, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/21
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/21
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/24
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Kenichi Handa, 2006/07/30
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/31
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Kenichi Handa, 2006/07/31
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/31
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Kenichi Handa, 2006/07/31