Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> return BUF_SAVE_MODIFF (buf) < BUF_CHARS_MODIFF (buf) ? Qt : Qnil;
>> Isn't this vulnerable to problems when MODIFF wraps around?

> Hmmm...  Do you think it's more vulnerable than `buffer-modified-p' or
> `update_menu_bar'?

Hmm... good point.  I just assumed that buffer-modified-p used "!=" instead
of "<", but indeed it uses "<" which makes it vulnerable as well.  I guess
wraparounds are sufficiently unlikely, then.


        Stefan