[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nested sit-for's
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Nested sit-for's |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:26:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
martin rudalics <address@hidden> writes:
>> Is the pre-command-hook installed permanently, or only when jit-lock is
>> active?
>>
>> IMHO, using a permanently installed pre-command-hook is not acceptable, but
>> it may be ok if only used temporarily...
>>
>> But why is this needed at all?
>
> Just a first shot. Try the revision.
My initial testing/impression: Works like a charm! Thanks!
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Nested sit-for's, (continued)
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/18
- Re: Nested sit-for's,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/22