[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: python-mode patch
From: |
Slawomir Nowaczyk |
Subject: |
Re: python-mode patch |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:08:35 +0200 |
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:27:58 -0400
Ken Manheimer <address@hidden> wrote:
#> if you're interested in scoping it out, look for variables and
#> functions that contain the string pdbtrack". i suspect most of it can
#> be used exactly as is.
#>
#> at 150 lines of code, and since i wrote the original, i would be happy
#> to sign papers for it.
Sounds great... Just in case, do you have the latest version of your
own code somewhere? If/when you sign papers, that is definitely
something we can use, while the code which currently resides in
python-mode.el might have been changed by other people as well, so I
presume we would need to get assignments from everybody who worked on
that.
Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, I guess it would be worthwhile to
try and seize more code from python-mode.el, but I do not know if it's
authors would be interested in signing papers for Emacs.
--
Best wishes,
Slawomir Nowaczyk
( address@hidden )
If it wasn't for C, we would be using BASI, PASAL, LIPPER and OBOL!
- Re: python-mode patch, (continued)
- Re: python-mode patch, David Kastrup, 2006/08/25
- Re: python-mode patch, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/25
- Re: python-mode patch, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2006/08/25
- Re: python-mode patch, Ken Manheimer, 2006/08/21
- Re: python-mode patch, Nick Roberts, 2006/08/23
- Re: python-mode patch, Ken Manheimer, 2006/08/23
- Re: python-mode patch,
Slawomir Nowaczyk <=
- Re: python-mode patch, Nick Roberts, 2006/08/24