[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
line-move-partial too costly ?
From: |
Michaël Cadilhac |
Subject: |
line-move-partial too costly ? |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:11:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Since the creation of line-move-partial, going to the next few lines
has become a P*TA.
I don't think my computer, with an Athlon XP 2000+, is too old to not
be concerned by Emacs user-friendliness :-)
With emacs -Q, if I entirely fill the scratch buffer (150 columns, 75
lines) and then press C-n and _stay on it_,[1] the cursor is blocked
at the second line. When C-n is released, Emacs responds only after
a second or so.
If I remove the call to line-move-partial, everything is fine (except,
certainly, the display of partial images).
The guilty part seems to be this one:
(let* ((ppos (posn-at-point))
(py (cdr (or (posn-actual-col-row ppos)
(posn-col-row ppos))))
(vs (window-vscroll nil t))
Is there any solution ?
Footnotes:
[1] I use xset r rate 300 250, which is quite speedy.
----
In GNU Emacs 22.0.50.44 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars)
of 2006-09-13 on mahaena
X server distributor `Gentoo (The X.Org Foundation 6.8.2, revision r6-0.1.13)',
version 11.0.60802000
configured using `configure '--prefix=/usr' 'CFLAGS=-ggdb -O0''
Important settings:
value of $LC_ALL: nil
value of $LC_COLLATE: nil
value of $LC_CTYPE: nil
value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil
value of $LC_MONETARY: nil
value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil
value of $LC_TIME: nil
value of $LANG: en_US
locale-coding-system: iso-8859-1
default-enable-multibyte-characters: t
----
--
/!\ My mail address changed, please update your files accordingly.
| Michaël `Micha' Cadilhac | (\(\ This is the cute bunny virus, |
| Epita/LRDE Promo 2007 | (^.^) please copy this into your |
| http://michael.cadilhac.name | (")") sig so it can spread. |
`-- - JID: address@hidden --' - --'
pgp9HfNTfsKy3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- line-move-partial too costly ?,
Michaël Cadilhac <=
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/09/13
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/09/14
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/09/19
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/09/19
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/19
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/09/20