[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug Database?
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: Bug Database? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:07:46 +1300 |
> > It depends how you measure things. They have more people using a recent
> > version of GDB and more people fixing bugs. There's a clear message: if
> > you want it fixed for the next version then you may have to fix it
> > yourself.
>
> Which results in the fact that gdb is since years completely unusable
> for C++ programs relying on templated functions (so basically all C++
> programs which aren't just pimped C).
We're moving a bit off-topic but I think refusing to release it until
it worked well for templated functions etc would just mean it didn't get
released at all.
> So most C++ developers I know have switched to the "free as in free beer
> but not free as in free software" debugger from Sun Studio which in
> contrast to gdb works really well.
People can choose not to fix GDB, it's a voluntary project.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
Re: Bug Database?, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/18
- Re: Bug Database?, Nick Roberts, 2006/10/18
- Re: Bug Database?, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/19
- Re: Bug Database?, Frank Schmitt, 2006/10/19
- Re: Bug Database?, David Kastrup, 2006/10/19
- Re: Bug Database?,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: Bug Database?, Frank Schmitt, 2006/10/19
- Re: Bug Database?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/10/19
- Re: Bug Database?, Nick Roberts, 2006/10/19
- Re: Bug Database?, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, Nick Roberts, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, Frank Schmitt, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, Miles Bader, 2006/10/20
Re: Bug Database?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/20
Re: Bug Database?, David Kastrup, 2006/10/20