[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and GFortran
From: |
Angelo Graziosi |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and GFortran |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:47:34 +0100 (MET) |
Perhaps I have some difficult to understand but I do not see a reason for
which a lot of compiler work with Emacs and GFortran which has substituted
G77 in the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) does not.
Cheers,
Angelo.
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:26:36AM +0100, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> >
> >
> > The only difference between G77 anf GFortran seems the line (<==).
> >
> > Why is it so hard for GFortran add that line?
>
> You again have chosen a simple case.
>
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> # This archive contains:
> #
> # l.inc
> # l.f90
> #
> echo x - l.inc
> sed 's/^X//' >l.inc << 'END-of-l.inc'
> X integer i
> END-of-l.inc
> echo x - l.f90
> sed 's/^X//' >l.f90 << 'END-of-l.f90'
> Xprogram a
> X include 'l.inc'
> X call i(j)
> Xend program a
> END-of-l.f90
> exit
>
> laptop:kargl[219] gfc -c l.f90
> In file l.inc:1
>
> Included at l.f90:2
>
> integer i
> 1
> In file l.f90:3
>
> call i(j)
> 2
> Error: 'i' at (1) has a type, which is not consistent with the CALL at (2)
>
> Is "NO" some difficult concept for you to understand?
> There are real, hard to fix bug, in bugzilla. I think
> the gfortran developers time is better spent on real
> problems.
>
> --
> Steve
>
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, (continued)
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, FX Coudert, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Miles Bader, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran,
Angelo Graziosi <=
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Chong Yidong, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, François-Xavier Coudert, 2006/10/30