[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build failure under Suse 10.0
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: Build failure under Suse 10.0 |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:06:15 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:29:52 +0100
>> From: "Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden>
>> Cc: address@hidden
>>
>> And, after all, we've been years waiting for the pretest. I don't
>> think a few days will make much difference.
>
> FWIW, I don't see any reasons to hurry with another pretest. AFAIR,
> we didn't yet hear from enough pretesters to have a clear idea of how
> many bugs are there, especially on unusual platforms.
For one thing, Richard hasn't sent out his announcement to the
emacs-pretesters list. I suggested to him to hold off making the
announcement: since 22.0.90 contains some obvious bugs that prevent
compilation on Windows, Mac, and OpenBSD, I think it's better to put
out a 22.0.91 tarball fixing this problems, so that testers won't
waste time reporting trivial "Emacs can't compile" bugs that are fixed
in CVS.
Do you disagree?
Re: Build failure under Suse 10.0, Frank Schmitt, 2006/10/30