[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ctags
From: |
Francesco Potorti` |
Subject: |
ctags |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Feb 2007 23:09:23 +0100 |
While modernizing etags/ctags, I allowed ctags to have dulicated tags,
and I set the --members option as a default for etags.
Now I ws wondering if we should go a small step farther.
/* The next five default to TRUE for etags, but to FALSE for ctags. */
static bool typedefs; /* -t: create tags for C and Ada typedefs */
static bool typedefs_or_cplusplus; /* -T: create tags for C typedefs, level */
/* 0 struct/enum/union decls, and C++ */
/* member functions. */
static bool constantypedefs; /* -d: create tags for C #define, enum */
/* constants and variables. */
/* -D: opposite of -d. Default under ctags. */
static bool globals; /* create tags for global variables */
static bool members; /* create tags for C member variables */
Should we have these default to TRUE for ctags also? Why not?
- ctags,
Francesco Potorti` <=