[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fundamental-mode-hook
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: fundamental-mode-hook |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:23:04 -0500 |
I thought a fundamental mode hook was a good solution to the problem
that there is no "new buffer" hook. But a special hook would perhaps be
better.
Creating a buffer does not call `fundamental-mode', so adding a
fundamental-mode-hook wouldn't do this anyway. Buffer creation
happens at a rather low level, but it can call Lisp code.
Adding a hook for that makes me worry, because I know that I hesitated
to do so, but I don't remember any specific reason why it was bad,
and it does call a function to help initialize UCS.
I don't want to consider such a change now.
- Re: fundamental-mode-hook, (continued)
- Re: fundamental-mode-hook, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/07
- Re: fundamental-mode-hook, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/02/07
- Re: fundamental-mode-hook, Karl Fogel, 2007/02/08
- Re: fundamental-mode-hook, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/02/08
- Re: fundamental-mode-hook, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/08
- Re: fundamental-mode-hook, Karl Fogel, 2007/02/08
Re: fundamental-mode-hook, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/08