[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: constant `e'
From: |
Edward O'Connor |
Subject: |
Re: constant `e' |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:34:25 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) |
Daniel Brockman wrote:
> Incidentally, I also think `(not (null n))' looks better
> than `n' --- as do, I believe, most Emacs Lisp programmers.
I think you mean Scheme programmers...
So I went back to the master and appealed once again
I said, pardon me, but now I'm really insane
He said, no you're not really going out of your head
Instead of just VAL, you must use NOT NULL instead
>From "A Short Ballad Dedicated to the Growth of Programs" by Ashwin
Ram, which you can find here:
http://www.lisp.org/humor/large-programs.html
--
Edward O'Connor
address@hidden
Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem.
- Re: constant `e', (continued)
- Re: constant `e', David Kastrup, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Stuart D. Herring, 2007/02/12
- Re: constant `e', Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', David Kastrup, 2007/02/11
- Re: constant `e', Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/11
- Re: constant `e',
Edward O'Connor <=
- Re: constant `e', Stuart D. Herring, 2007/02/12
- Re: constant `e', Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/12
- Re: constant `e', David Kastrup, 2007/02/12
Re: constant `e', Richard Stallman, 2007/02/10
Re: constant `e', Alan Mackenzie, 2007/02/10