|
From: | Kim F. Storm |
Subject: | Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time |
Date: | Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:22:22 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes: > martin rudalics <address@hidden> writes: > >>> So it seems plain stupid to release it with a setting that will impact >>> and annoy users and cause a support burden after the release. >> >> While I agree with all of David's arguments (and even add the one >> that a buffer tail is stealthily refontified after every single >> buffer change followed by 16 secs idleness) I'm afraid that setting >> this to nil won't remove any support burden. Many major modes still >> work better when they are allowed to fontify a buffer from beginning >> to end. > > But stealth mode does not guarantee that at all. It is completely > irreproducible whether or not some buffer has been completely > stealthified. Agree! I actually think Martin's argument speaks _against_ a non-nil default value of jit-lock-stealth-time -- no major mode should ever rely on such convoluted behavior. -- Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |