[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --with-gtk as default?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: --with-gtk as default? |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:48:22 +0200 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:40:23 +0100
> Cc: Nick Roberts <address@hidden>,
> Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv?= <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
>
> Sigh. So the default Emacs installations for decades to come are
> going to show off the utterly archaic Athena look
I don't see why this should be inevitable. I'd expect the
distributors of GNU/Linux systems (RH, Debian, Suse, etc.) to provide
packages built with several (perhaps even all) supported toolkits,
including GTK+, even if it's not the default. At least, that's what I
would do if I were the individual responsible for packaging Emacs.
IOW, the GNU project does not provide binaries for GNU/Linux
distributions, so how those binaries are configured and built is not
up to us.
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, (continued)
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Romain Francoise, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Ralf Angeli, 2007/02/28