[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:35:30 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.96 (gnu/linux) |
>> There's no indication that doing it right (i.e. doing the coding-system
>> decoding somewhere in the w32 code which turns w32 events into elisp events)
>> is difficult. AFAICT nobody has really tried to do it.
> Anything to do with coding-systems in C code is difficult. Especially when
> almost every encoding on Windows involves autoloaded CCL based
> coding-systems.
It doesn't have to be done in C. Since decoding may run elisp code, it has
to be done somewhere where lisp can be run, so you may as well do it by
calling an elisp routine from C. Of course, you have to figure out where to
do it, and make sure that it's indeed a place where lisp can be run.
Stefan
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/01
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/01
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/01
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/04/01
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Davis Herring, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/03