[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Apr 2007 12:55:51 +0300 |
> From: Romain Francoise <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:48:17 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > They already did: at least one Debian user told me in some forum
> > (I think gnu.emacs.help) that "C-h F" and "C-h K" didn't work
> > because the manuals were not there.
>
> C-h F and C-h K are new in Emacs 22
Yes. The person who told me that used the v21.x equivalents "C-h C-f"
and "C-h C-k". This doesn't change the essence of the problem, which
is that Emacs 21 was shipped without documentation.
> and the Emacs 22 package in
> Debian (emacs-snapshot) ships all the manuals (for the time being).
If they did that once, and on purpose, they can do it again.
- arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin, Kevin Ryde, 2007/04/02
- Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/04/02
- Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin, Kevin Ryde, 2007/04/02
- Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin, David Kastrup, 2007/04/03
- Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin, Romain Francoise, 2007/04/03
- Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin, David Kastrup, 2007/04/03
- Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin, Miles Bader, 2007/04/03
- Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin, Davi Leal, 2007/04/03
- Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin, David Kastrup, 2007/04/03
- Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/03
- Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin, Chong Yidong, 2007/04/03
- Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin, Johan Bockgård, 2007/04/03
- Re: [debian-vrms] Bug#221807: "please take this into consideration", David Diaz, 2007/04/04
- Re: [debian-vrms] Bug#221807: "please take this into consideration", Bdale Garbee, 2007/04/04
- Re: [debian-vrms] Bug#221807: "please take this into consideration", David Diaz, 2007/04/05