[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Apr 2007 14:33:52 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
>> >> 2 - Use the Cygwin version of Emacs.
>> > Not really an option, since Cygwin doesn't support Windows 9x very
>> > well (if at all), AFAIK.
>>
>> Hmm... oh but wait, don't they get to be able to use the MS-DOS
>> port instead?
> Isn't that 2 days late?
> (MS-DOS port supports only a single non-ASCII locale, and on W9x that
> locale cannot be changed without rebooting the machine.)
Still: if they want to use Emacs>22 under Windows 9x, it's an option.
Stefan
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, (continued)
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/04