[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: weird desktop.el change
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: weird desktop.el change |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:25:38 +0900 |
"Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden> writes:
>> A quick glance suggests that Eli's change was correct (the return values
>> of the calls to mapc/mapcar are all ignored, so using mapc seems OK),
>> and does indeed avoid some consing, so why did you revert it?
>
> That's one of Kevin Rodgers changes that has been reverted to allow
> the release to go on.
Er, OK... does such a trivial and purely mechanical change really
count? What if I make an equivalent change now?
-Miles
--
Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here,
beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?
- weird desktop.el change, Miles Bader, 2007/04/10
- Re: weird desktop.el change, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/04/10
- Re: weird desktop.el change,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: weird desktop.el change, Chong Yidong, 2007/04/10
- Re: weird desktop.el change, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/04/11
- Re: weird desktop.el change, Richard Matthew Stallman, 2007/04/11
- Re: weird desktop.el change, Miles Bader, 2007/04/11
- Re: weird desktop.el change, Markus Triska, 2007/04/13
- Re: weird desktop.el change, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/13
- Re: weird desktop.el change, Markus Triska, 2007/04/13
- Re: weird desktop.el change, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/13
- Re: weird desktop.el change, Markus Triska, 2007/04/14
- Re: weird desktop.el change, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/15