[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual? |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:37:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.98 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Done. I mentioned this in NEWS. I am not sure about the DOC string
> of `query-replace-regexp-eval', though: since it is obsoleted, would
> it be appropriate to have all the info except that of its deprecation
> be ripped from it?
>
> Our general policy is to retain the information about a function and
> what it does, when we make it obsolete. I see no reason to make a
> special exception for this function.
Oh, I was not asking for an exception, but rather about the rule.
> So please do not delete anything.
Done.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, (continued)
- RE: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, Drew Adams, 2007/04/15
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/16
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, David Kastrup, 2007/04/16
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/17
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, David Kastrup, 2007/04/17
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/18
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?,
David Kastrup <=