[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs pretest 22.0.99
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs pretest 22.0.99 |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:26:00 +0300 |
> From: Nick Roberts <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:53:31 +1200
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> It looks like 21.1 is actually 21.1.1, 21.2 is actually 21.2.1 etc - I didn't
> realise that. No, I was suggesting 22.1.2, 22.1.3 etc as bug-fix release
> numbers (now omitting 22.1.1).
If we release version 22.1.2, then its first build on the end-user
machine would be 22.1.2.1, the second build 22.1.2.2, etc. This is
what I meant: you are suggesting to enlarge the number of digits in
the version string.
- Emacs pretest 22.0.99, Chong Yidong, 2007/04/23
- Re: Emacs pretest 22.0.99, Nick Roberts, 2007/04/24
- Re: Emacs pretest 22.0.99, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/24
- Re: Emacs pretest 22.0.99, Nick Roberts, 2007/04/24
- Re: Emacs pretest 22.0.99, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/24
- Re: Emacs pretest 22.0.99, Nick Roberts, 2007/04/24
- Re: Emacs pretest 22.0.99,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs pretest 22.0.99, Nick Roberts, 2007/04/25
- Re: Emacs pretest 22.0.99, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/25
- Re: Emacs pretest 22.0.99, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/24
- Re: Emacs pretest 22.0.99, Nick Roberts, 2007/04/24
- Re: Emacs pretest 22.0.99, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/25
Re: Emacs pretest 22.0.99, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/04/24